| skip navigation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
home the archives faculty services arts & science departments college of arts & science mu campus |
Making anti-drug campaigns more effectiveAn anti-drug ad that educates one group of parents about fighting teenage drug use might not be as effective with a different group of parents, according to one researcher’s findings at the University of Missouri-Columbia. And now, he has some ideas on how to improve the overall effectiveness of anti-drug ads that target parents. Michael T. Stephenson, assistant professor of Communication, surveyed 156 parents of children in seventh, ninth and 11th grades in the Columbia Public School District. From their responses to a survey, he classified parents into one of three parenting styles: Authoritative: parents who are very demanding, yet very warm toward their children. Stephenson found that authoritative parents do not think their children are at risk for substance use. Authoritarian parents do perceive that their children are at risk but are ill informed as to what they can do to prevent their children from using drugs. Permissive parents do not know their children are at risk and are aloof about the subject. Using each of these parenting styles and their characteristics, Stephenson developed strategies to focus on each type of parent in order to help them protect their children against substance use. Based on his findings, Stephenson suggests that:
Southern Communication Journal published the article "Anti-drug public service announcements targeting parents: An analysis and evaluation" in 2002. 2002 Additional links: |
| copyright © 2000 The Curators of the University of Missouri Last update: 29-Sep-2005 contact the project: Web information |